Predictive Victory Dynamics Day 8 Guide
Predictive Victory Dynamics Day 8 contains two different contests: Mirror Fruity Order meets What Does the Ninken Say? in the third-place playoff, and Saurians Are the Cutest meets Reserve Grenadier Squad in the championship match. The actual final-round board identifies both pairings. Compare the current event panels and recorded scoring values here before deciding how to use your remaining Victory Emblems.
Sources reviewed ; original recording clocks and servers unknown. Page edited . The reviewed final board is In Progress; neither final-day winner is verified.
Published by Predictive Victory Dynamics Guide · Send a source correction
Watch the original Day 8 final-round briefing
This 46-second independent briefing uses original diagrams and synthetic English narration to identify both final-day contests, summarize current panel gaps and distinguish semifinal results from predictions. Burned English captions are included; an optional track and transcript are also available. No third-party gameplay is rehosted.
Predictive Victory Dynamics Day 8 matchups
The recorded navigation highlights Final Showdown as In Progress. Its first contest is labeled Third-Place Playoff and its second Championship Match. These labels matter: choosing a third-place team does not choose the overall champion. Left and right in this guide follow the actual board, preserving each match's separate Emblem allocation and scoring inputs.
| Contest | Left / side A | Right / side B | Site recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: Third-Place Playoff | Mirror Fruity Order | What Does the Ninken Say? | Evidence incomplete; no recommended split |
| 2: Championship Match | Saurians Are the Cutest | Reserve Grenadier Squad | Evidence incomplete; no recommended split |
Both finalists also have explicit semifinal Winners cards. Those cards independently establish their earlier victories; the final bracket alone would not be sufficient settlement evidence. The third-place pairing similarly does not establish which team will win this new contest. Review the new round rather than treating an earlier success, a familiar enemy name or the ordering of portraits as a result.
Current Day 8 unit panels: HP, ATK and skills
The table contains 5 named numeric panel types from actual Day 8 footage, with 4 complete descriptions. Every entry is tied to the current recording. Earlier semifinal values remain in their own archive and are not copied here to fill an unopened final-round panel. HP and ATK belong to the displayed unit panel; they are not verified combined team totals.
| Match / side / unit | Level | Max HP / ATK | Targeting, skill and evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 A: Treasure Hoarder Scout | 80 | 13,000 / 2,300 | Squad, Ranged. Ranged unit. Each squad has 3 members. They hurl throwing knives to deal Physical DMG. Complete description reviewed. Actual Day 8 panel |
| M1 B: Swiftshadow Ninken | 80 | 70,000 / 10,800 | AoE, Ranged, Cannot Target Flying. Ranged unit that cannot target flying units. Attacks enemy units with its ninja blade, dealing Electro DMG. After defeating an opponent, its next attack becomes a Plunging Attack that deals a single powerful instance of AoE Electro DMG. Complete description reviewed. Actual Day 8 panel |
| M2 B: Oprichniki Hailstorm Cannoneer | 80 | 43,000 / 9,800 | Single-Target, Melee, Cannot Target Flying. Melee unit. Fires heavy Cryo cannons through enemy formation after deployment. On entering the field, aims and fires a heavy cannon, dealing Cryo DMG to enemy units. Complete description reviewed. Actual Day 8 panel |
| M2 B: Wislawa (skill text incomplete) | 80 | 45,000 / 2,300 | AoE, Melee, Cannot Target Flying. Visible partial text: melee unit fighting with twin guns, long-ranged shots from each hand in turn deal Electro DMG, then sweeping fire deals AoE Electro DMG. The entry description begins a powerful barrage dealing continuous damage but the rest is clipped. Skill text incomplete. Actual Day 8 panel |
| M2 B: Fatui Skirmisher - Cryogunner Legionnaire | 80 | 25,000 / 6,100 | AoE, Melee, Cannot Target Flying. Melee unit with a musket-shaped gun firing frost jets for AoE Cryo DMG. On entering the field, leaps towards enemy units and deals AoE Cryo DMG. Complete description reviewed. Actual Day 8 panel |
Portrait multiplicity describes a formation, while one opened panel verifies that named type only. A three-member squad does not establish whether the listed HP is per member. Melee, ranged and cannot-target-flying tags should be read literally from the event screen, even when a unit's weapon or name suggests a different role.
Compare entry attacks, ground-targeting limits, area damage and effects triggered by defeating an opponent. Then ask whether the opposing formation actually enables each effect. Unreadable skill clauses, unopened units and unknown targeting order remain evidence gaps. A high ATK figure alone cannot answer those interaction questions, so it cannot justify a precise win probability or an all-in recommendation.
Recorded Support Rates and score values
| Contest | Support: A / B | Winning points per Emblem: A / B | Recorded countdown | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match 1 | 16% / 84% | 105 / 30 | 22 hours 28 minutes | Recording snapshot |
| Match 2 | 36% / 64% | 70 / 35 | 22 hours 28 minutes | Recording snapshot |
Support Rate measures player support, not the chance of winning a simulated battle. Separate recordings can show different values. Because their original recording clocks and servers are unknown, this guide does not arrange those observations into a rising or falling live trend. Review times identify when we checked evidence; they do not reveal when those players recorded their screens.
Use the winning points currently displayed in your game, or the applicable locked value after support locks. The score figure is used directly as points per Emblem in the calculations below. Do not apply an extra base multiplier to it. A favorable payout can increase one outcome's score without making that outcome more likely.
Day 8 prediction decision and semifinal results
No supported directional pick or recommended Emblem percentage is published for Day 8. Current panels improve the comparison, but incomplete skill and formation evidence still prevents a defensible allocation recommendation. The recorded creator's selections and popularity percentages are separate observations; neither becomes this site's pick.
The actual semifinal cards verify Saurians Are the Cutest in Match 1 and Reserve Grenadier Squad in Match 2. The source account's successful calculations are 50 × 30 = 1,500 and 50 × 35 = 1,750, totaling 3,250. Read the Day 7 settlement archive for the exact cards. These are that account's scores, not points earned by this website.
Fourteen historical match winners are now verified. Site accuracy remains N/A because zero eligible site predictions were publicly recorded before their settlements. We will add final-day results only after explicit result evidence appears. The prediction log preserves the original denominator and does not backdate a successful selection.
Compare four final-round Emblem score outcomes
For arithmetic only, take a hypothetical budget of 100 Emblems. Select side A in both matches and assign 50 to each. Use the recorded A-side winning values of 105 and 70, and an assumed applicable losing value of 10 points per Emblem. These are arbitrary teaching selections and a teaching split, not recommendations, actual site entries or estimated win probabilities.
| Outcome for the example selections | Added score |
|---|---|
| Both win | 50 × 105 + 50 × 70 = 8,750 |
| Only Match 1 wins | 50 × 105 + 50 × 10 = 5,750 |
| Only Match 2 wins | 50 × 10 + 50 × 70 = 4,000 |
| Both lose | 50 × 10 + 50 × 10 = 1,000 |
Replace every input with your own budget, selected side and applicable scoring rule. Add only already-settled score to each outcome, then compare the resulting totals with your next reward threshold. If you already have 5,800 settled points and target 8,000, the 1,000-point outcome leaves a 1,200-point gap. A larger possible return does not eliminate that lower outcome.
The Victory Emblem Planner compares all four scenarios without requiring a probability. Advanced estimates are optional user inputs. Neither an expected score nor a locally saved plan submits a prediction or claims an in-game reward. After deciding, confirm the intended team and amount on your actual event screen before its countdown expires.
Final prediction deadline, support lock and result period
The published English UTC−4 schedule and continuous 24-hour windows give a derived Day 8 opening of October 19 at 02:00 UTC and round boundary of October 20 at 02:00 UTC. The separate four-hour support-lock rule gives a derived lock of October 19 at 22:00 UTC. Those calculations are not independent observations of every server's deadline.
The official competition cutoff is written as October 19 at 21:59 UTC−4, or October 20 at 01:59 UTC. That is the last listed minute; the continuous-window boundary is one minute later. For Korea these are October 20 at 10:59 KST and the derived 11:00 boundary. Use the official cutoff and your in-game countdown, and submit before the final minute rather than relying on a schedule calculation.
The published announcement period follows the competition and runs through October 22 at 21:59 UTC−4, equivalent to October 23 at 01:59 UTC or 10:59 KST. That later period does not reopen a missed prediction window. Check participation rewards and score rewards separately in the reward conditions and claim checklist.
Day 8 questions
Are the championship and third-place playoff separate matches?
Yes. The actual board explicitly labels both contests. Each has its own teams and scoring values, so keep their selections and Emblem amounts separate.
Does 84% support mean an 84% chance to win?
No. It is player support in a historical recording. It is not a calibrated combat probability or a final result.
Can I use the semifinal winners as guaranteed final picks?
No. Earlier victory establishes an earlier result only. A new opponent and incompletely reviewed interactions require a fresh comparison.
Are final winners available on this page?
Not yet verified. The reviewed final-round footage still shows In Progress. We will link actual settlement cards when confirmed rather than infer outcomes from support or video titles.
Sources and verification
Actual final-round panels and board reviewed . Recording clocks and servers unknown. Current Third-Place Playoff board and Championship Match evidence establish named contests independently of the calendar. Unit and support rows retain their own exact frame links.
The first semifinal Winners card, second Winners card and round summary were reviewed October 19 at 17:10:25 UTC. The official English notice is the schedule basis. Review dates, page edits and unknown recording times are separate.